| What's
in a Name? |
by Christopher R. Chase,
Esq. (© 2006)
Frankfurt, Kurnit, Klein & Selz PC |
What’s in a name? If you are an individual artist
or group in the music industry, there are numerous assets
within your professional name, such as goodwill, commercial
recognition, and valuable intellectual property rights.
The reputation and recognition of an artist’s music
is built around the artist’s professional name, which
is what consumers use to identify the artists they enjoy.
Therefore, an individual artist or group pursuing a career
in the music industry should take the necessary steps
to protect his, her or its professional name. This protection
can be obtained through the use of trademark law. Having
trademark protection gives the artist the knowledge that
he, she, or it is legally entitled to use the professional
name in a commercial setting without the fear that another
artist or party has a claim of ownership for that name
– Dinosaur Jr., Green Jelly, Death From Above 1979,
and Suede are just a few examples of artists that were
forced to change names due to trademark issues. Additionally,
trademark protection can prevent others from using the
same or similar professional name in the music industry.
Background On Trademark Law
A trademark or service mark is a word, name, or symbol
that informs the public of the source of the goods or
services being offered, and assures the public of the
legitimacy and quality of the goods or services being
offered. Generally referred to as just “trademarks,”
service marks are used to identify services offered to
the public, while a trademark, on the other hand, distinguishes
the words, names, or symbols used on tangible physical
goods. An artist’s professional name may function
as a service mark for entertainment services if it is
used to identify and distinguish the service of providing
live performances from other artists or as a trademark
for a series of musical recordings or other merchandise
such as t-shirts, stickers, and posters.
In the United States, trademark and service mark rights
are created by use in commerce and the resulting development
of “secondary meaning” – the public’s
recognition and association of the mark with a source
of goods or services. Because rights are based on use,
an artist need not register his, her or its name in order
to claim rights in or protection for that name as a mark.
The artist must only be the first party to continuously
use the name in commerce for the specific goods and services
offered under that name.
Although it is not required to protect a mark, federal
registration of a trademark or service mark provides certain
statutory benefits that are not provided by an unregistered
or “common law” mark. Registering the professional
name as a trademark or service mark is truly the best
way to protect it because registration prevents third
parties and departing group members from capitalizing
on the name. Unlike common law marks, if the artist intends
to use a name in commerce but has not done so, the artist
may apply for trademark registration based on that intent,
and receive priority over any subsequent users. Essentially,
although an artist may have a common law trademark or
service mark in its name because of its prior use of that
name, it is always advisable to register the mark with
the United States Patent and Trademark Office because
such registration demonstrates the validity of the trademark
and gives the artist exclusive ownership over the name.
In order to claim trademark or service mark rights in
its professional name, the most significant thing an artist
can do is to deliberately and continuously use the mark
in public over a geographically extensive area to identify
itself. This use must be continuous, as it is possible
that if an artist held trademark rights to its name and
ceased touring, making and releasing records, and receiving
royalties, it would be deemed to have ceased use of its
name because the public would no longer identify the artist
with activities in the music industry. Therefore, an artist
must actively perform and offer, or at least collect royalties
for, records, CDs or other merchandise under its professional
name to maintain trademark or service mark status.
Choosing and Clearing the Artist’s Name
Like any other trademark, when selecting an artist’s
professional name it is important to adopt a name that
is distinctive and unique. The more distinctive the name,
the more effective the protection the name has as a trademark.
Moreover, an artist not only wants a distinctive name
to protect its own identity, but the artist needs to avoid
infringing upon other parties’ names. Because the
likelihood of confusion between two marks is the hallmark
for trademark violations, a new artist should not choose
a professional name that is identical to or even similar
to an existing name in the music industry. Litigation
over the proper ownership of the name requires both time
and money, and there is a risk that the artist could lose
the right to use the name. Because the goodwill in its
name is all a new artist has when starting its foray into
the music industry, starting over is not an option! Therefore,
it is extremely important for an artist to clear his,
her, or its professional name prior to significant use
in the industry.
There have been numerous instances where an up and coming
artist had to change its name due to trademark issues.
For example, “Dinosaur Jr.” (formerly “Dinosaur”),
“The Hopefuls” (formerly “The Olympic
Hopefuls”), “Green Jelly” (formerly
“Green Jello”), “Death From Above 1979”
(formerly “Death From Above”), and “The
Verve” (formerly “Verve”) all had to
change their professional names due to various trademark
issues, the latter two involving similar record label
names rather than other artist names. Moreover, it is
not only unknown artists that have to change their professional
names, as commercially successful artists can be trumped
by the “little guy” that has priority over
the professional name. A recent example involved CBS’
rock band reality show Rock Star: Supernova, wherein the
band, comprised of famous musicians and the show’s
winner, was called “Supernova.” A lawsuit
filed by a lesser known band called “Supernova”
forced the reality band to change its name (not too creatively
to “Rock Star Supernova”). Even the U.S. Postal
Service was not pleased to see that there was an artist
called “The Postal Service,” but an amicable
resolution allowed the artist to retain its name.
Because the music industry is global, artists must also
choose a name that will not infringe on foreign artists’
marks if the artist desires to go abroad. In the mid-1990’s,
popular British bands “Suede” and “The
Charlatans” were forced to change their names for
the U.S. market due to artists’ prior uses of those
names in the United States. “Suede’s”
change to “The London Suede” and “The
Charlatans” change to “The Charlatans U.K.”
may have harmed both bands’ chances at widespread
U.S. success, as they could not rely on the goodwill associated
with their famous name back home. So it is important for
an artist to search the music industry worldwide in order
to avoid conflicts when going abroad.
That being said, it is not enough to take a trip to
the local record store to clear an artist’s name.
An artist must check numerous sources to survey the global
music industry, such as the databases of the performing
rights societies (e.g., ASCAP, BMI, SESAC) and musicians’
unions (such as the American Federation of Musicians),
music magazines, and review popular music websites such
as MySpace, PureVolume, Pitchfork, All Music Guide, and
The Band Register.
Finally, having the clear right and title to an artist’s
professional name is necessary if the artist seeks to
sign a recording contract. Because record labels will
need to use the name in connection with the marketing
and sale of pre-recorded audio, they will generally not
sign an artist unless that artist owns the rights to its
name, free and clear of any third party rights.
Protection of Artists’ Names
Recognizing the value of an artist’s name as a
mark, courts have frequently applied trademark law to
protect the professional names of artists. Rights to an
artist’s professional name and the right to perform
under that professional name are significant rights in
the music and recording industry. Such rights are monetarily
valuable to both the artist and record companies alike,
and preventative legal measures should be taken in order
to ensure protection for the name.
Regardless of whether it’s registered or not, the
artist’s professional name will only have trademark
protection in the field for which the mark is used, plus
in the logical zone of expansion of that field. For artists,
this field will primarily be entertainment services and
pre-recorded audio and video. Ancillary goods, such as
posters and t-shirts, may be within the logical zone of
expansion, but the artist’s professional name often
needs to achieve secondary meaning in order to have trademark
protection for such goods.
Once the artist’s professional name is properly
used as a trademark or service mark, the artist must enforce
its rights to that mark. No other party in the industry
should use or exploit the professional name without permission,
if at all. Not protecting the name could be perceived
as demonstrating the inherent weakness of the artist’s
name as a mark. Therefore, the artist must prevent other
parties in the music industry, including artists or bootleg
merchandisers, from using or exploiting his, her, or its
valuable mark.
Artists should also register their professional name
as an Internet domain name. While this is not a substitute
for trademark registration, operating a website at that
domain name would go a long way to show use of the name
as a mark in commerce and would put others on notice of
the artist’s use of the name in the music industry.
Publicity Rights
In addition to the use of trademark law to protect the
artist’s name, state right of publicity laws can
offer additional protection. These laws generally protect
a person’s name, picture, likeness, or voice from
being commercially appropriated, and have been extended
to an artist’s professional name – be it the
artist’s actual name or stage name. The band Weezer
recently sued Miller Brewing Co. and its advertising agency
under both right of publicity and trademark laws for using
the name Weezer in advertisements promoting Miller’s
beer, arguing that its name was being commercially appropriated
without authorization.
Because artists often license their names and likenesses
for commercial exploitation, the artist has a strong interest
in preventing unauthorized use of their professional names
and can do so through both rights of publicity and trademark
laws.
Conclusion
The rights in an artist’s professional name are
extremely important. The artist’s professional name
is a valuable commodity that helps consumers identify
the artist’s goods and services. Therefore it is
imperative that an artist clear his, her, or its professional
name before offering goods or services under that name,
and protects the name once it is used in commerce. While
it may seem like an expensive proposition during the start-up
phase of an artist’s career, obtaining trademark
protection is well worth the effort if an artist plans
on having a lasting career in the industry.
*********
Please feel free to contact Mr.
Chase if you have any questions or comments. This
article is only a background discussion regarding trademark
issues, but is not legal advice, and may not be applicable
in all situations. Since trademark law is quite complex,
it might be useful to consult an attorney who can assist
with the search and registration process for an artist’s
name as a trademark or service mark.