| What's
in a Name? |
by Christopher R. Chase,
Esq. (© 2006)
Frankfurt, Kurnit, Klein & Selz PC |
What’s in a name? If you are an individual artist
or group in the music industry, there are numerous
assets within your professional name, such as goodwill,
commercial recognition, and valuable intellectual
property rights. The reputation and recognition of
an artist’s music is built around the artist’s
professional name, which is what consumers use to
identify the artists they enjoy.
Therefore, an individual artist or group pursuing
a career in the music industry should take the necessary
steps to protect his, her or its professional name.
This protection can be obtained through the use
of trademark law. Having trademark protection gives
the artist the knowledge that he, she, or it is
legally entitled to use the professional name in
a commercial setting without the fear that another
artist or party has a claim of ownership for that
name – Dinosaur Jr., Green Jelly, Death From
Above 1979, and Suede are just a few examples of
artists that were forced to change names due to
trademark issues. Additionally, trademark protection
can prevent others from using the same or similar
professional name in the music industry.
Background On Trademark Law
A trademark or service mark is a word, name, or
symbol that informs the public of the source of
the goods or services being offered, and assures
the public of the legitimacy and quality of the
goods or services being offered. Generally referred
to as just “trademarks,” service marks
are used to identify services offered to the public,
while a trademark, on the other hand, distinguishes
the words, names, or symbols used on tangible physical
goods. An artist’s professional name may function
as a service mark for entertainment services if
it is used to identify and distinguish the service
of providing live performances from other artists
or as a trademark for a series of musical recordings
or other merchandise such as t-shirts, stickers,
and posters.
In the United States, trademark and service mark
rights are created by use in commerce and the resulting
development of “secondary meaning” –
the public’s recognition and association of
the mark with a source of goods or services. Because
rights are based on use, an artist need not register
his, her or its name in order to claim rights in
or protection for that name as a mark. The artist
must only be the first party to continuously use
the name in commerce for the specific goods and
services offered under that name.
Although it is not required to protect a mark,
federal registration of a trademark or service mark
provides certain statutory benefits that are not
provided by an unregistered or “common law”
mark. Registering the professional name as a trademark
or service mark is truly the best way to protect
it because registration prevents third parties and
departing group members from capitalizing on the
name. Unlike common law marks, if the artist intends
to use a name in commerce but has not done so, the
artist may apply for trademark registration based
on that intent, and receive priority over any subsequent
users. Essentially, although an artist may have
a common law trademark or service mark in its name
because of its prior use of that name, it is always
advisable to register the mark with the United States
Patent and Trademark Office because such registration
demonstrates the validity of the trademark and gives
the artist exclusive ownership over the name.
In order to claim trademark or service mark rights
in its professional name, the most significant thing
an artist can do is to deliberately and continuously
use the mark in public over a geographically extensive
area to identify itself. This use must be continuous,
as it is possible that if an artist held trademark
rights to its name and ceased touring, making and
releasing records, and receiving royalties, it would
be deemed to have ceased use of its name because
the public would no longer identify the artist with
activities in the music industry. Therefore, an
artist must actively perform and offer, or at least
collect royalties for, records, CDs or other merchandise
under its professional name to maintain trademark
or service mark status.
Choosing and Clearing the Artist’s
Name
Like any other trademark, when selecting an artist’s
professional name it is important to adopt a name
that is distinctive and unique. The more distinctive
the name, the more effective the protection the
name has as a trademark. Moreover, an artist not
only wants a distinctive name to protect its own
identity, but the artist needs to avoid infringing
upon other parties’ names. Because the likelihood
of confusion between two marks is the hallmark for
trademark violations, a new artist should not choose
a professional name that is identical to or even
similar to an existing name in the music industry.
Litigation over the proper ownership of the name
requires both time and money, and there is a risk
that the artist could lose the right to use the
name. Because the goodwill in its name is all a
new artist has when starting its foray into the
music industry, starting over is not an option!
Therefore, it is extremely important for an artist
to clear his, her, or its professional name prior
to significant use in the industry.
There have been numerous instances where an up
and coming artist had to change its name due to
trademark issues. For example, “Dinosaur Jr.”
(formerly “Dinosaur”), “The Hopefuls”
(formerly “The Olympic Hopefuls”), “Green
Jelly” (formerly “Green Jello”),
“Death From Above 1979” (formerly “Death
From Above”), and “The Verve”
(formerly “Verve”) all had to change
their professional names due to various trademark
issues, the latter two involving similar record
label names rather than other artist names. Moreover,
it is not only unknown artists that have to change
their professional names, as commercially successful
artists can be trumped by the “little guy”
that has priority over the professional name. A
recent example involved CBS’ rock band reality
show Rock Star: Supernova, wherein the band, comprised
of famous musicians and the show’s winner,
was called “Supernova.” A lawsuit filed
by a lesser known band called “Supernova”
forced the reality band to change its name (not
too creatively to “Rock Star Supernova”).
Even the U.S. Postal Service was not pleased to
see that there was an artist called “The Postal
Service,” but an amicable resolution allowed
the artist to retain its name.
Because the music industry is global, artists
must also choose a name that will not infringe on
foreign artists’ marks if the artist desires
to go abroad. In the mid-1990’s, popular British
bands “Suede” and “The Charlatans”
were forced to change their names for the U.S. market
due to artists’ prior uses of those names
in the United States. “Suede’s”
change to “The London Suede” and “The
Charlatans” change to “The Charlatans
U.K.” may have harmed both bands’ chances
at widespread U.S. success, as they could not rely
on the goodwill associated with their famous name
back home. So it is important for an artist to search
the music industry worldwide in order to avoid conflicts
when going abroad.
That being said, it is not enough to take a trip
to the local record store to clear an artist’s
name. An artist must check numerous sources to survey
the global music industry, such as the databases
of the performing rights societies (e.g., ASCAP,
BMI, SESAC) and musicians’ unions (such as
the American Federation of Musicians), music magazines,
and review popular music websites such as MySpace,
PureVolume, Pitchfork, All Music Guide, and The
Band Register.
Finally, having the clear right and title to an
artist’s professional name is necessary if
the artist seeks to sign a recording contract. Because
record labels will need to use the name in connection
with the marketing and sale of pre-recorded audio,
they will generally not sign an artist unless that
artist owns the rights to its name, free and clear
of any third party rights.
Protection of Artists’ Names
Recognizing the value of an artist’s name
as a mark, courts have frequently applied trademark
law to protect the professional names of artists.
Rights to an artist’s professional name and
the right to perform under that professional name
are significant rights in the music and recording
industry. Such rights are monetarily valuable to
both the artist and record companies alike, and
preventative legal measures should be taken in order
to ensure protection for the name.
Regardless of whether it’s registered or
not, the artist’s professional name will only
have trademark protection in the field for which
the mark is used, plus in the logical zone of expansion
of that field. For artists, this field will primarily
be entertainment services and pre-recorded audio
and video. Ancillary goods, such as posters and
t-shirts, may be within the logical zone of expansion,
but the artist’s professional name often needs
to achieve secondary meaning in order to have trademark
protection for such goods.
Once the artist’s professional name is properly
used as a trademark or service mark, the artist
must enforce its rights to that mark. No other party
in the industry should use or exploit the professional
name without permission, if at all. Not protecting
the name could be perceived as demonstrating the
inherent weakness of the artist’s name as
a mark. Therefore, the artist must prevent other
parties in the music industry, including artists
or bootleg merchandisers, from using or exploiting
his, her, or its valuable mark.
Artists should also register their professional
name as an Internet domain name. While this is not
a substitute for trademark registration, operating
a website at that domain name would go a long way
to show use of the name as a mark in commerce and
would put others on notice of the artist’s
use of the name in the music industry.
Publicity Rights
In addition to the use of trademark law to protect
the artist’s name, state right of publicity
laws can offer additional protection. These laws
generally protect a person’s name, picture,
likeness, or voice from being commercially appropriated,
and have been extended to an artist’s professional
name – be it the artist’s actual name
or stage name. The band Weezer recently sued Miller
Brewing Co. and its advertising agency under both
right of publicity and trademark laws for using
the name Weezer in advertisements promoting Miller’s
beer, arguing that its name was being commercially
appropriated without authorization.
Because artists often license their names and likenesses
for commercial exploitation, the artist has a strong
interest in preventing unauthorized use of their
professional names and can do so through both rights
of publicity and trademark laws.
Conclusion
The rights in an artist’s professional name
are extremely important. The artist’s professional
name is a valuable commodity that helps consumers
identify the artist’s goods and services.
Therefore it is imperative that an artist clear
his, her, or its professional name before offering
goods or services under that name, and protects
the name once it is used in commerce. While it may
seem like an expensive proposition during the start-up
phase of an artist’s career, obtaining trademark
protection is well worth the effort if an artist
plans on having a lasting career in the industry.
*********
Please feel free to contact Mr.
Chase if you have any questions or comments.
This article is only a background discussion regarding
trademark issues, but is not legal advice, and may
not be applicable in all situations. Since trademark
law is quite complex, it might be useful to consult
an attorney who can assist with the search and registration
process for an artist’s name as a trademark
or service mark.